4 ms·
That previous discussion is of a different article by a different author, but, yes, this issue deserves a lot of discussion. The article submitted to open this
by tokenadult 11y ago
That previous discussion is of a different article by a different author, but, yes, this issue deserves a lot of discussion. The article submitted to open this thread is by two authors who follow the research literature on this topic closely and who review much of the prior literature in their commentary article.
- scott_s 11y agoA different article, yes, but I think the currently submitted one is a reaction to the linked one. I was going to link to the previous discussion, too, as I think this discussion and that one are necessarily related. Which makes me think maybe HN should have some mechanism to say "This article is related to this other one", and point to the HN submission for it.
- tokenadult 11y agoWhich makes me think maybe HN should have some mechanism to say "This article is related to this other one", and point to the HN submission for it. I guess our user comments here in this subthread are that mechanism. By the way, this whole thread is an implementation of the new HN algorithm that revives threads that are missed on first submission and gain upvotes later. I notice that is implemented by resetting the submission date on the submission. (I was the original submitter, so I remember when I first submitted this thread.)