2 ms·
The big dig helps, but as someone who worked 20 minutes north on the same highway, the traffic just seems to have shifted north. The biggest win is the second
by acomjean 11y ago
The big dig helps, but as someone who worked 20 minutes north on the same highway, the traffic just seems to have shifted north.
The biggest win is the second tunnel to the airport and the extra space.
Boston/Mass has a history of failing and/or giving up on infrastructure (2020 olympics/ North South Rail link, Cape wind, Hollywood East Studios) and taking their time on others (finally new garden, convention center). So while its impressive the big dig got built, this city needs public transit so bad and even the small expansion of the green line (old trolleys) into somerville has been so delayed and mismanaged (no bid contracts!) its in danger of being canceled.
I think part of the problem is regional transportation expansions here can be canceled by very local authorities (see red line expansion into arlington)
I think givernments need to realize people are its natural resource and making them want to stay is important. Commuting here is not great. MS/Facebook/Napster all started in Massachusetts, but went west to become viable.
- Johnny555 11y agoThis is a classic case of induced demand - build bigger/better roads and more people will use them. The money would be better spent on improving transit and walkability/bikability of the city (to encourage people to live closer to work) A freeway lane carries around 2400 passengers/hour, a light rail line can carry around 20,000 passengers/hour. Heavy or commuter rail can carry around 40,000 passengers/hour.