3 ms·
I really have to ask... Why? What's the difference between this and using Nancy with a Knockout VM?
by dimgl 11y ago
I really have to ask... Why? What's the difference between this and using Nancy with a Knockout VM?
- SideburnsOfDoom 11y agoI don't know this framework, but I found the introduction page which explains what it is (1) It also addresses the "why" question: > build your app really fast. And this's the goal of DotVVM. So it would automate the "boring" and boilerplate code on server and in web page to link everything up. I can't say if it's a worthwhile saving, or if the DotMVVM framework will handle the edge cases well enough. In my experience, that's where frameworks fall down if they fall down - they wow you by making the simple things trivial, but then the non-standard things become prohibitively hard. But that that's the idea, anyway. 1) http://www.dotvvm.com/docs/tutorials/introduction http://www.dotvvm.com/docs/tutorials/introduction
- exyi 11y agoWe tried to make it extensible enough to handle most use cases. Of course, neither things like GC don't solve every possible use case and I expect DotVVM to be much more "specialized". It is based on knockout and probably will not be very useful in application, where knockout would not be. However if you would have troubles with something concrete don't mind to ask us. And have created a gitter room for chatting about it: https://gitter.im/riganti/dotvvm https://gitter.im/riganti/dotvvm