Fair enough. Yes, PG is arguing that reducing income inequality is bad. He did not address the hypothetical notion that there is a goldilocks zone of 'just eno

Fair enough. Yes, PG is arguing that reducing income inequality is bad. He did not address the hypothetical notion that there is a goldilocks zone of 'just enough' inequality, either side of which is suboptimal (due to the 'systemic destabilization' or some other deleterious effect of inequality having a dampening effect on productivity that exceeds inequality's positive effects on productivity after some level), and none of the critiques brought up such an argument either, so I didn't feel the need to address that.