3 ms·
Hey Rob- that was probably unfairly harsh of me. I have tried to like the syntax for the last year and I've had trouble. Anyway, I know you are a big contribut
by plexicle 11y ago
Hey Rob- that was probably unfairly harsh of me. I have tried to like the syntax for the last year and I've had trouble.
Anyway, I know you are a big contributer, do you mind showing me the discussion where we determined '*ngFor=' and '[(two-way)]=' was implemented to play nicely with WC? I would be interested in reading. Thanks!
- robwormald 11y agoseriously, not offended :) you get used to it working on frameworks :D The longest (heated) discussion ever covers a lot of the reasoning: https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/133 https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/133 More in depth design stuff here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kpuR512G1b0D8egl9245OHaG0cFh0ST0ekhD_g8sxtI/edit#heading=h.xgjl2srtytjt https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kpuR512G1b0D8egl9245OHaG... Demo: ng2 + google-youtube polymer element : http://plnkr.co/edit/yh0ACeu6g5n8D7YuhJvg?p=preview http://plnkr.co/edit/yh0ACeu6g5n8D7YuhJvg?p=preview
- plexicle 11y agoGreat, looking forward to reading these. Thanks!