3 ms·
i wouldn't say it was "false" so much as "simplified." it was "microsoft's operating system" in the sense that they owned it, had the rights to license it to i
by allenbrunson 19y ago
i wouldn't say it was "false" so much as "simplified." it was "microsoft's operating system" in the sense that they owned it, had the rights to license it to ibm, and saw potential where ibm didn't.