7 ms·
In Manhattan it's 23% (http://www.nycedc.com/blog-entry/new-yorkers-and-cars http://www.nycedc.com/blog-entry/new-yorkers-and-cars). This is quite scarce relati
by wadenick 11y ago
In Manhattan it's 23% (http://www.nycedc.com/blog-entry/new-yorkers-and-cars http://www.nycedc.com/blog-entry/new-yorkers-and-cars). This is quite scarce relative to the rest of the USA and indeed even relative to the suburban boroughs of the greater New York City metro area. For the US the last average I saw (World Bank data http://web.archive.org/web/20140209114811/http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IS.VEH.NVEH.P3 http://web.archive.org/web/20140209114811/http://data.worldb...) was 81%.
- JumpCrisscross 11y agoI should have said Manhattan. 23% is "scarce" in that, on the island, there are relatively few gas stations, parking is expensive, and getting your car serviced reasonably encumbering. It's also a four-fold reduction from the U.S. average. How much cheaper would a driverless Lyft or taxi be? 50%? How many more people would forego driving, in Manhattan, if ridesharing were half as expensive as it is today? If half do we're at 11.5% car ownership, a 7-fold reduction from the present-day U.S. average. If 2/3 do, we get to 10-fold.
- wadenick 11y agoYes, I agree with your premise here. Personal anecdote, I lived in San Francisco in the city 8 years. It was by far more economical for me to have both Zipcar and taxis (later UberX and Lyft) combined per month than to have a vehicle lease + parking costs + insurance/maintenance/gas. By far. In both $ and time. I'm not certain that other elements of your vision work in non-metro areas.
- prawn 11y agoWhat percentage of people live in metro areas though?
- JumpCrisscross 11y agoIn 2010, 80.7% of Americans live in an areas with an overall population density of 2,534 people per square mile [1]. [1] http://www.reuters.com/article/usa-cities-population-idUSL2E8EQ5AJ20120326 http://www.reuters.com/article/usa-cities-population-idUSL2E...