You have the misguided ideas that there is such a thing as "the social contract", that society's impositions and thefts are "investments", and that, ultimately,

You have the misguided ideas that there is such a thing as "the social contract", that society's impositions and thefts are "investments", and that, ultimately, those who oppose the infliction of subservience have some obligation to leave rather than stay and fight for their rightful freedom. By your logic, any slave who didn't run away from a plantation was "accepting a social contract" and had no right to complain about his state.