3 ms·
Why? If I had to guess, it's because there's more than a little C code out in the wild that relies on "typical" signed overflow behavior.
by twoodfin 11y ago
Why? If I had to guess, it's because there's more than a little C code out in the wild that relies on "typical" signed overflow behavior.
- renox 11y agoI don't know: both compilers are trying to use 'undefined use' to optimize code (and too bad for you if this create problems for your application), so your explanation isn't coherent.. My explanation is: lack of interest/money: security is the thing that is always ignored, see the lack of funding of OpenSSL until recently..