10 ms·
I suppose it's a good project with good intentions, but it's still only as useful as the content it points to. Take, for instance, Geocities - the amazing free
by themartorana 11y ago
I suppose it's a good project with good intentions, but it's still only as useful as the content it points to. Take, for instance, Geocities - the amazing free platform where everyone was experimenting with websites at the same time.
It's all gone.
A permanent URL helps not-at-all. True, the Web Archive has a lot of old Geocities pages cached, but most of the time I find something missing, the content is gone. It has nothing to do with the wrong URL.
That said, it's a nice way to claim a "permanent" URL for say, yourself. It lets you change domain names and whatnot in the future.
Still, I don't mean to downplay the good intentions. I just wonder what the half-life of the database is - that is, before half of all claimed perm URLs point to nothing.
- firasd 11y agoRight. The main source of linkrot isn’t that a webpage was carefully moved from place A to place B (in that case you could just use google to find it again), it’s that the webpage content isn’t maintained anymore. It's just gone.