3 ms·

I have trouble endorsing positions like this just at the level of ethics. Refusing to work with others because of 'disagreements,' even those as similar as her

I have trouble endorsing positions like this just at the level of ethics. Refusing to work with others because of 'disagreements,' even those as similar as her fellow writers, is a good way to never have an impact on the world and change it for the better. I think it's easy to be among 'the herd', working with people of diverse backgrounds, while also staying true to yourself, and I think you could argue it's an essential skill if you ever want to accomplish something great. What does that say about your strength of person that you find it threatening, or at the minimum, a 'big deal,' to associate with those you disagree with?

Nutmog 11y ago
I think she meant the group kicked her out because the other members were unable to work with someone who openly disagreed with them.
bootload 11y ago
"I think it's easy to be among 'the herd', working with people of diverse backgrounds, while also staying true to yourself, and I think you could argue it's an essential skill if you ever want to accomplish something great." Grey man. Say nothing, don't make ripples and don't be noticed. Works well when SHTF and possibly when nothing of any consequence is happening. There is one aspect I don't like with this approach: By sitting back, not being noticed you loose the chance to lead. In LOTF I can think of one person who tried this approach, Simon. When he voiced his opinion on the snake thingy, noting it was in fact a dead airman, he was ignored. By taking the grey man approach you fail to take the chance and opportunity to lead, letting others dictate your situation.