Um, am I the only one here confused at why this guy is arguing with PG? From what I can tell they are in full agreement. Ron here is saying we shouldn't kill s

Um, am I the only one here confused at why this guy is arguing with PG? From what I can tell they are in full agreement. Ron here is saying we shouldn't kill startups (what PG calls "creating wealth"), we should instead fight against practices that actually take money from the poor and give to the rich (what PG calls "zero-sum games"). After reading PG's article, I got the impression that he wants the exact same thing as Ron does. What's there to argue? PG even has a paragraph in his essay that is almost equivalent to the title of the article: > There are lots of things wrong with the US that have economic inequality as a symptom. We should fix those things. In the process we may decrease economic inequality. But we can't start from the symptom and hope to fix the underlying causes.