4 ms·
I assume it's https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/chinese-hackers-who-breached-google-gained-access-to-sensitive-data-us-officials-say/2013/
by magicalist 11y ago
I assume it's
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/chinese-hackers-who-breached-google-gained-access-to-sensitive-data-us-officials-say/2013/05/20/51330428-be34-11e2-89c9-3be8095fe767_story.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/chine...
but it wasn't "PRISM-like", it was an internal database of accounts under court ordered surveillance (in this case, orders specifically "issued under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act"), and it wasn't the attack vector, it was apparently the attack target.
- skj 11y agoSounds like the typical twisting of facts from a conspiracy theorist. That said, I welcome evidence of the original claim.