4 ms·
Ah, I was being lighthearted with that word choice, and I don't have any axe to grind with PG personally. An alternative which captures the same sentiment witho
by cryoshon 11y ago
Ah, I was being lighthearted with that word choice, and I don't have any axe to grind with PG personally. An alternative which captures the same sentiment without any negative connotations would be "maestro" "majordomo" "magnate" or even "de Medici".
- Mz 11y ago"Founder" or "investor" are equally accurate as to who and what PG happens to be. If you are writing for the HN audience, you can assume that the vast majority of your readers are well aware who is and how much power he exercises. To me, your "clarification" smacks of "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely and (in my opinion) pg simply has a too distasteful amount of power to be assumed to be a decent human being."
- dibujante 11y agooh my god he is being tongue in cheek seriously