4 ms·
You might not want to read that, afaik that technique is patented. :)
by dman 11y ago
You might not want to read that, afaik that technique is patented. :)
- geofft 11y agoWell now that you said that it's 3x damages, whether or not you read it (at least in the US, the standard is whether there's "an objectively high likelihood" of infringing some patent that is "either known or so obvious that it should have been known" to you, so knowing that a thing's been patented counts even if you don't read the patent). But even 1x damages are pretty high. Read it carefully and do something sufficiently different and avoid infringement in the first place.