Projects that use github merely as a mirror always run into the issue that of all features pull requests are the only one that you cannot disable, and they have

Projects that use github merely as a mirror always run into the issue that of all features pull requests are the only one that you cannot disable, and they have to deal with closing pull requests, pointing to the real contribution process. So far github has always rejected the possibility to disable pull requests. The problem with Sourceforge is that we now have a thousand unmaintained projects only available there as an archive and are risking to lose them if we're not careful. It seems easier to build a github-to-new_thing service as long as github cooperates (web api throttling). If git is to be the dominant tool, it should support a wiki, tickets, code review and more complete distribution. Kinda like Fossil++. I hope git-appraisal or at least the idea gets more popular.