4 ms·
A "Rumsfeldian" visualizer. Neat! http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/03/rumsfelds-knowns-and-unknowns-the-intellectual-history-of-a-quip/359719/
by marcusgarvey 11y ago
A "Rumsfeldian" visualizer. Neat!
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/03/rumsfelds-knowns-and-unknowns-the-intellectual-history-of-a-quip/359719/ http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/03/rumsfeld...
- coldtea 11y agoI always find it strange that people found that thing Rumsfeld said dumb, bizarre or (worse) his own invention [1]. Those are standard epistemological distinctions, known (and written about) since at least the times of Aristotle. [1] (I mean the philosophical essence of what he said -- not that he didn't tried to use it an an excuse for BS).
- gojomo 11y agoI also find it interesting that the aerospace/defense world (and co-influencing cultures in engineering and government) have sometimes used 'unk-unk' as shorthand for 'unknown unknowns'. http://www.waywordradio.org/unk_unk/ http://www.waywordradio.org/unk_unk/