3 ms·

Could you elaborate, for a layman, on why their decision to make 2.x backwards compatible with 1.x doesn't follow semantic versioning rules?

• deleted 11y ago
  [deleted]
  • lopatin 11y ago
    Got it, thanks. Would it have been easier for you as a dev if they made this a minor version bump rather than a major version? Given that the code and documentation changes would have been the same.
    • lopatin 11y ago
      It looks like all the comments by VeilEm are deleted now, which is unfortunate. No matter how controversial or indelicately phrased, you expressed frustrations with an open source project that no doubt also have and I think you should stand by what you said.