I don't read it that way. Maybe it's because I've written some agendaless tirades like that myself, but to me, it sounds like he's just pounding out exactly wha

I don't read it that way. Maybe it's because I've written some agendaless tirades like that myself, but to me, it sounds like he's just pounding out exactly what he's thinking on the subject. Can you point out the parts of the post that you believe are "indirect" or "adulterated", and why you don't believe they're sincere expressions of belief in context?