I'm sorry, this is just plain stupid. Giving cops inaccurate weapons is not going to make them less trigger-happy, you'll just wind up with more bystanders sho

I'm sorry, this is just plain stupid. Giving cops inaccurate weapons is not going to make them less trigger-happy, you'll just wind up with more bystanders shot. Yes, the NYPD does have a problem with heavy trigger pulls, whether you agree or not. Many expert sources have pointed this problem out. If you want to hit a target, a heavy trigger pull makes it more likely you'll torque the gun and miss your target. Going back to revolvers isn't going to fix that (though at least the revolvers were heavier so maybe the effect wasn't as bad). If you want to argue about police tactics, recruitment, training, or purpose, this isn't the place for it. This is a thread about pistols and trigger pull weights. As for military duty, that should be a plus for police duty. Military soldiers have to learn about things like "rules of engagement" and had very strict training about that. If they saw combat, then they are also much less likely to lose their demeanor when dealing with a rough situation, because they've already seen much worse. The cops who have all the problems seem to be ones who were never in the military, and probably would have been (or were) rejected if they had applied: basically thugs who want to play soldier and never got the chance. Notice that you never hear about problems with military police (MPs) shooting people unnecessarily, despite the extremely high numbers of non-white people in the military? I think there's a reason for that.