3 ms·
It's mostly trolly though. I mean, read through some of his complaints: > No high level, stable, sane (truly forward and backward compatible) and standardized
by awalton 11y ago
It's mostly trolly though. I mean, read through some of his complaints:
> No high level, stable, sane (truly forward and backward compatible) and standardized API for developing GUI applications
Really? He's calling Win32 sane and stable? The API where they're constantly having to introduce terrifying new hacks to stay bug compatible with themselves and still failing?
Most of it's the same trolls we hear every day. A lot of it is good, well-founded bitching that the Linux community can absolutely do nothing about (we don't have access to hardware specifications we don't have, that simple. Until various trouble manufacturers, nVidia first and foremost, decide to start playing ball, their hardware is always going to suck on Linux).
- condescendence 11y agoThank you, that last part said it better than I ever could. >A lot of it is good, well-founded bitching that the Linux community can absolutely do nothing about (we don't have access to hardware specifications we don't have, that simple
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- FireBeyond 11y agoYeah. Except he doesn't mention Win32 in this context. Does Win32 have to be sane/stable before Linux should have something adopted?