6 ms·
Isn't this already happening? http://www.ubuntu.com/certification/desktop/ http://www.ubuntu.com/certification/desktop/
by jkbyc 11y ago
Isn't this already happening? http://www.ubuntu.com/certification/desktop/ http://www.ubuntu.com/certification/desktop/
- brightball 11y agoWell then. It's as if the people at Ubuntu are pretty smart and know what they're doing. :-)
- sciurus 11y agoExcept they certify systems with lots of problems. Dell had to stop selling their XPS 13 with Ubuntu for a while due to the number of issues. http://bartongeorge.net/2015/07/20/xps-13-developer-edition-on-pause/ http://bartongeorge.net/2015/07/20/xps-13-developer-edition-...
- ggreer 11y agoBeware. I went out of my way to get an Ubuntu certified laptop[1]. It took me months to get it to a usable state. Graphics drivers crashed or corrupted the screen[2]. Bluetooth didn't work. Wifi didn't work. While suspended to RAM, it drained 10% of the battery every hour. In short, it was a nightmare. I've had it for almost two years now, and I've given up on getting Bluetooth to work. After resuming from suspend, the wifi works about half the time, and screen brightness is always set to maximum. It's tolerable, but I only use the laptop when I have to. I doubt I'll ever buy a Linux laptop again, but if I do, I'll be sure to try it hands-on before buying. 1. The Lenovo X140e: http://www.ubuntu.com/certification/hardware/201309-14195/ http://www.ubuntu.com/certification/hardware/201309-14195/ 2. https://twitter.com/ggreer/status/548923450640056321 https://twitter.com/ggreer/status/548923450640056321
- simoncion 11y ago> Beware. I went out of my way to get an Ubuntu certified laptop[1]. It took me months to get it to a usable state. Why didn't you return it and get -say- a Thinkpad? (Were you -perhaps- just curious how shitty the "Ubuntu Certified Laptop" program is?) It clearly failed the "Fitness for advertised purpose" test. AFAIK -if you're in the US- the seller can't refuse to accept your return... unless it was sold as-is. > I doubt I'll ever buy a Linux laptop again, but if I do, I'll be sure to try it hands-on before buying. I've found great success with the following method: * Get a detailed list of the parts inside a given laptop. (lspci info from the target model is a really good sign) * Run screaming if the video card is made by Nvidia. [0] * Find if there are in-tree kernel drivers for each of the parts. (If there are, this is a really good sign.) * Find the out-of-tree drivers for the remaining parts, and see if there are solid plans to get them in-tree. (If there are any such plans, that's a good sign.) * Discover the known issues for all of those drivers. * If the drivers seem to do everything that I need them to, and the known issues list doesn't contain any show-stoppers, the laptop will likely work just fine. :) [0] I know that this is a controversial opinion. I've had awful luck with the nouveau driver and really bad luck with the official Nvidia driver. Other people haven't. I'll stick with Intel-powered laptop video cards if I can. :)
- ggreer 11y ago> Why didn't you return it and get -say- a Thinkpad? The Lenovo X140e is a ThinkPad.[1] I didn't blindly trust Ubuntu's certification. I made sure to get a brand that historically has had good Linux support. I also knew about Nvidia graphics and avoided them. Still, I got burned. I don't doubt your checklist is good advice for buying a Linux laptop, but it's simply too time consuming to check all of those things. Even if it wasn't, the likelihood of everything working well is low. All it takes is one bad driver for one piece of hardware and the laptop becomes a constant annoyance. Considering the number of hardware devices (Bluetooth, wifi, mic, camera(s), trackpad, GPU, fan, power saving, etc.) it's all but certain something will go wrong. Maybe audio won't automatically switch between headphone and speaker output. Maybe the fan will run at a few discrete speeds instead of gradually ramping up/down. Maybe it will wake from sleep if you open the lid, but not if you hit a key on the keyboard. I'd rather just pay money and get something that I know will work. That's why my main development machine is a MacBook. I wish there was a competing brand of unix laptops, but so far… no dice. :( 1. http://shop.lenovo.com/us/en/laptops/thinkpad/x-series/x140e/ http://shop.lenovo.com/us/en/laptops/thinkpad/x-series/x140e... Though after I purchased it, some people told me it wasn't a true ThinkPad, whatever that means.
- simoncion 11y ago> The Lenovo X140e is a ThinkPad. Oh, heh. Derp. Edit: I mean to say: My bad. I overlooked that. :( I see at [0] that the only Ubuntu Certified configuration is with a rather ancient pre-installed version of Ubuntu. Did you get the system in that configuration, or did you purchase it and put Linux on it? [1] Regardless. Why didn't you return it and get something that worked? Curiosity? Cussedness? > [I]t's simply too time consuming to check all of those things. Odd. I find it reasonable to spend between a couple of days to a week researching the suitability of something that I'll use throughout the day, every single day for next three-to-ten years. Perhaps my opinion is atypical. > Considering the number of hardware devices (Bluetooth, wifi, mic, camera(s), trackpad, GPU, fan, power saving, etc.) it's all but certain something will go wrong. I guess I've had fantastic luck with my personal selections and the recommendations that I've given to others. Given that luck is my super power, I'm somewhat willing to believe that my experience is somewhat atypical. :) Anyway. Good luck with your projects and such, and I hope that Apple keeps producing hardware that meets your needs. [0] http://www.ubuntu.com/certification/hardware/201309-14195/ http://www.ubuntu.com/certification/hardware/201309-14195/ [1] Still... one would expect that any Ubuntu Certified Laptop that has a supported hardware configuration would be detected by the Ubuntu installer and configured appropriately (or you'd get a big fat warning when the hardware isn't "supported" by a later Ubuntu release). OTOH, Canonical isn't the best at getting things right, so... :-/