4 ms·
Or there's always this 1.0 variant. Has a known tendency to kick and bite. But usually quieter. Can haul almost as much. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mule htt
by smithkl42 11y ago
Or there's always this 1.0 variant. Has a known tendency to kick and bite. But usually quieter. Can haul almost as much.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mule https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mule
- cpursley 11y agoFor just $12.99 you can get the CD: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gov%27t_Mule https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gov%27t_Mule
- lowmagnet 11y agoOr M.U.L.E., made of scrap parts: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M.U.L.E https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M.U.L.E.
- evv 11y agoOr this one. The alternative fuel source makes it slightly quieter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXJZVZFRFJc#t=23s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXJZVZFRFJc#t=23s
- desdiv 11y agoConsidering the part of world we're mostly fighting in now, maybe it's high time to reactivate this Civil War era experimental unit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Camel_Corps https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Camel_Corps
- dingaling 11y agoUnfortunately Mule 1.0 suffers from reduced payload at higher altitudes ( falling below 100kg for the top breed ) and tire quickly, requiring frequent resets. They also require 30 to 50 litres of water per day, depending upon climate, so on a three-day mountain patrol they can basically carry only their own water and no other payload. Not terribly useful. Plus fodder... Courtesy of the Argentinian army, here's a table of the mule resources required to sustain a 171-man company on a six-day mountain march: http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/groundcombat/chart4.jpg http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/groundcombat/char... Yes, 232 mules and 171 men.