4 ms·
Consider Google bought Motorola for $12.5B[1] and Oracle bought Sun for $5.6 billion[2], I would think Google buying Sun would have been a better deal than buyi
by protomyth 11y ago
Consider Google bought Motorola for $12.5B[1] and Oracle bought Sun for $5.6 billion[2], I would think Google buying Sun would have been a better deal than buying Motorola.
1) http://bgr.com/2014/02/13/google-motorola-sale-interview-lenovo/ http://bgr.com/2014/02/13/google-motorola-sale-interview-len...
2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_acquisition_by_Oracle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_acquisition_by_Oracle
- bitmapbrother 11y agoPerhaps, but it's not like Google lost much by buying Motorola. "I think the Motorola transaction has been a success for us. Financially, we bought the asset for $12.5 billion. It had $3 billion in cash; we were able to sell the Home division for $2.5 billion; we ended selling the handset division for $3 billion. There were some other tax assets as well. When you work through the math, you realize we spent between $2.5 billion and $3.5 billion for the patent assets. At the time, the nearest comparable transaction was the Nortel patent auction where Microsoft and Apple teamed up to buy that asset for $4.5 billion. And there’s a good argument that the Motorola patent portfolio is a better portfolio."
- robotresearcher 11y agoNice informative quote is missing an attribution. Google finds it in an interview in Forbes with Dan Harrison, Google's head of M&A.