3 ms·
He's very fond of philosophising. I also have issues with his approach to the many-worlds interpretation. Not sure what his current position on that matter is,
by cygx 11y ago
He's very fond of philosophising.
I also have issues with his approach to the many-worlds interpretation. Not sure what his current position on that matter is, but one of his talks I saw speculated about identifying the 'branches' of the wavefunction with distant locations of an inflationary multiverse.
This sounded like nonsense to me: One of the major points of that interpretation is making the wave function universal (the title of Everett's dissertation actually was "The Theory of the Universal Wave function").