3 ms·
The far simpler interpretation is that they're likely vetted far beyond what the local PD is capable of. Which doesn't change if you swap out the description of
by brazzledazzle 11y ago
The far simpler interpretation is that they're likely vetted far beyond what the local PD is capable of. Which doesn't change if you swap out the description of the agency. It should have been a huge red flag for the detective or their management.
- dragonwriter 11y agoThe context in which it is mentioned is not about why the police should have done more vetting of the information, but of supposed advantages they have in legally fighting a poorly-justified police raid in the legal system that other targets of such raids would not have; material resources, being white, and a law-enforcement employment background are the three given examples -- the first is quite real advantage, the second is a real feature, though how much of an advantage it is in the contextay be debatable, and the last is simply false, based on the misidentification of the CIA as a law-enforcement agency.