5 ms·
I think this is a fantastic case against the "if you have nothing to hide" argument. The apologist would say "but they weren't convicted of anything, so the sy
by eric_h 11y ago
I think this is a fantastic case against the "if you have nothing to hide" argument.
The apologist would say "but they weren't convicted of anything, so the system worked!"
Personally, I would say they were lucky that no one was killed. None of the "probable cause" for this raid justifies pointing a loaded gun(s) at an unarmed person.