I can confirm. From outside the USA it looks extremely weird. But, you know, we do things that are weird for you. For me the most ironic part is that by this r

I can confirm. From outside the USA it looks extremely weird. But, you know, we do things that are weird for you. For me the most ironic part is that by this rules you maybe will fire a really good worker that tried drugs. Why do you want to fire a good worker that doesn't causes any trouble? Maybe makes sense for people, for example, that uses firearms at work. But it will not make sense if it is not complemented with some kind of mental health care. Really, I see it as really really weird. I see that the journalist also sees it that way. But on the comments looks like it is not so much. Is it really so usual to do this? Isn't this seen as an invasion of personal privacy?