> People who say that the system is broken need to first reconcile their claim with my statement of fact. No they don't. The system can be broken without conf

> People who say that the system is broken need to first reconcile their claim with my statement of fact. No they don't. The system can be broken without conflicting with your statement of fact that we lead in software innovation. You think those things are conflicting, they are not. > Totally agree. Good thing I did none of that. It's all you've done, and you just did it again by claiming they need to reconcile with your fact; no they don't, another fallacy the false choice.