3 ms·
I read that to mean there was only one study that was randomized & controlled. Basically when you say "there are studies that show X" you aren't saying anythin
by fractaled 11y ago
I read that to mean there was only one study that was randomized & controlled.
Basically when you say "there are studies that show X" you aren't saying anything because "studies" are cheap unless your methodology is rigorous and sound, which isn't the case a lot of the time.
- leereeves 11y agoOf course. Here are three randomized, controlled studies just from the first page of the Google Scholar results: http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=204290&resultclick=1 http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=20429... http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/ajp.2006.163.5.805 http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/ajp.2006.16... http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=204334 http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=20433... Apparently, 91 papers passed Nussbaumer et al's assessment of the abstract (and were presumably randomized, controlled trials): We assessed 91 full-text papers for inclusion in the review, but only one study providing data from 46 people met our eligibility criteria. Those eligibility criteria were: For efficacy, we included randomised controlled trials on adults with a history of winter-type SAD who were free of symptoms at the beginning of the study. I think it may have been the focus on prevention (rather than treatment of symptomatic depression) that excluded all the other papers. I just skimmed the paper the paper the first time and didn't notice that the authors were searching for studies of a very specific question: prevention (excluding treatment) of seasonal affective disorder (excluding any other form of depression).