3 ms·
Very generally, think pascalish golang. Eschews heavy abstraction, lower keyword count, green threads built in, modules instead of packages, no implicit type ca
by jksmith 11y ago
Very generally, think pascalish golang. Eschews heavy abstraction, lower keyword count, green threads built in, modules instead of packages, no implicit type casts, copious compile errors. It did not have garbage collection, but I'm sure M2R10 will offer something in that area.
Topspeed made an awesome compiler and libraries for M2 back in the DOS days. The package came with a cute traffic simulator demo showing off the multitasking capabilities of M2. Logitech (yes, the mouse and keyboard guys) was another vendor back in the day, along with Stonybrook (sweet optimizations) and XDS, a Russian company which I believe wrote some M2 code for the Russian space program.