It depends how you interpret non-neutrality: 1. Laws written to allow different "lanes" of traffic, with protections that prohibit censorship and don't raise t

It depends how you interpret non-neutrality: 1. Laws written to allow different "lanes" of traffic, with protections that prohibit censorship and don't raise the bar of entry for websites. 2. Providers mostly have free reign to slow/stop any data that crosses their network and charge anyone however they want. Given Facebook's internet.org and similar "zero-rating" schemes, I'm not sure you can dismiss argument 2 so easily.