3 ms·
That's what I thought at first, but $400M and 12 years should have been enough to put together a pretty solid uTAS seeing as microfluidic integration wasn't exa
by jjoonathan 11y ago
That's what I thought at first, but $400M and 12 years should have been enough to put together a pretty solid uTAS seeing as microfluidic integration wasn't exactly bleeding edge back then either. But they seem to have drunk their own kool-aid and created a working environment so toxic that they sabotaged their own chances to fake it till they made it. They might still get there, but even if they do there's a lesson to be had about expectation management.
EDIT: to clarify, I'm not the source of downvotes. Before the recent media explosion I believed exactly as you did.
- Zigurd 11y agoSomehow the ability to spend money scales pretty well relative to the ability to raise it.
- XorNot 11y agoAnyone working in microfluidics would've been skeptical at the time and is probably not surprised now. Microfluidics is amazingly hard to make work properly, and the history of the field is littered with great ideas which proved to be much harder to execute reliably.