3 ms·
Wait, why do you think that "The market is big"? When you did customer validation it failed because the city wasn't big enough. And when you looked at bigger
by icefox 11y ago
Wait, why do you think that "The market is big"? When you did customer validation it failed because the city wasn't big enough. And when you looked at bigger cities you found have better options than this idea. That sounds like the market is actually not that big.
Even the premise seems a bit fuzzy: Can we deliver a pizza in 10-15 min instead of 1-2 hours? Is the problem that it takes to long to deliver or that the delivery is so varied? Maybe people cared much more about the time it is delivered than the speed? If I am told the pizza will be here at 8pm and it arrives at 8:20 I am annoyed, but if I was told it would be here at 8:20 I might be perfectly happy. The question to determine is are they losing sales because of speed or because of the accuracy of the last time they had a delivery?
But above the question based upon your existing research why not open a joint in the bay that sells high quality pizza delivered and $1 pizza if you walk in as that is clearly what the market is validating?
- tedmiston 11y agoAdmittedly, I've glossed over the market aspects for this thread. To gauge the size, we used a standard report from the pizza industry that a seed stage VC friend helped me find, which gave us: - $36.7B U.S. pizza sales in 2012 - 75-77% of 18-44 year olds are pizza customers - 410 million pizzas picked up or delivered per year In Cincinnati, we think it's not the size of the city, but that the population is distributed in pockets that are too far apart from each other (i.e., to be simultaneously served by one pizza truck quickly). Our consumer validation showed that what most people value in delivery is: speed (~50%), cost (~30%), and quality (~20%). We would like to work on food tech in the future, and mostly likely in the bay, but the three of us weren't ready to leave Cincinnati yet :).