3 ms·

How can he when the company in question and the DNC are both for Hillary. How can they know if there is evidence with out the cooperation of those entities. Hen

How can he when the company in question and the DNC are both for Hillary. How can they know if there is evidence with out the cooperation of those entities. Hence why they are suing to gain access to those records.

tarr11 11y ago
The characterization was that Sanders is "Saturnine" while Clinton is circling the wagons and counterattacking. Clinton said that she was ready to move on from this, while Sanders is looking for an investigation. Since there's nothing else to discover about the Sanders campaign, the public and repeated calls for investigation is presumably to find a smoking gun to prosecute the Clinton campaign, the DNC and the data company for collusion and worse. Seems like a counter-attack to me.
- wernercd 11y ago
  As if the public needs a smoking gun when the Clinton is surrounded by scandals from A to Z. It amazes me that Sanders isn't going guns-a-blazing with all the Scandals and Corruption that emanates from the Clinton name brand. Why look for the needle in a haystack when you have a stack of needles sitting next to the haystack?
  - samstave 11y ago
    Just look at how many vids exist, even from years ago, of Hillary caught in various lies: https://www.google.com/search?q=video+of+hillary+lying&rlz=1CDGOYI_enUS651US651&hl=en-US&prmd=vni&source=lnms&tbm=vid&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjxzumckvrJAhVV_mMKHdQSDFUQ_AUIBygB https://www.google.com/search?q=video+of+hillary+lying&rlz=1...
  - d23 11y ago
    The problem is our politicians have a nasty habit of overplaying their hand on every. single. "scandal." It starts to sound like the boy who cried wolf. Every time a new one pops up, it's hard to tell whether it is of substance or just another game of political football. It makes sense that after two decades of attacks on their name, the public is a little more hesitant to be riled up.
  - MaysonL 11y ago
    All the accusations of Scandals and Corruption that emanate from the Republican echo chamber. There, ftfy.
    - wernercd 11y ago
      That's it... keep your head stuck in the sand. That'll make all the "accusations" untrue. Those wasky wepublicans. They made 40 years of lies and scandals ALL up. Every. Single. One. I mean... being a Democrat is more important that the truth. Or more important than being an American... Seriously though... At least BS seems to have the credibility that 'Liar'y doesn't. There is a reason Hillary is losing in credibility and trust-ability. Blaming Republicans is like blaming Obama's falling numbers on racism: Proof that you can't stay focused on the facts and instead have to focus on the big bad boogey man. I couldn't in good conscience ever vote for a Democrat, but I'd vote BS before 'liar'y any day of the week.
- themartorana 11y ago
  Of course she was ready to move on. That would provide for maximum damage to the Sanders campaign and minimum investigation into hers. I trust her less that I trust Trump, and that's not at all.
- mfisher87 11y ago
  She was ready to move on when someone else got attacked, yes. Why wouldn't she? She only stands to benefit from ignoring the issue, and she stands to suffer for engaging.
- wetmore 11y ago
  >The characterization was that Sanders is "Saturnine" The characterization was of Obama, not Sanders. Or at least that's what the post says right now.

tarr11 11y ago

The characterization was that Sanders is "Saturnine" while Clinton is circling the wagons and counterattacking. Clinton said that she was ready to move on from this, while Sanders is looking for an investigation. Since there's nothing else to discover about the Sanders campaign, the public and repeated calls for investigation is presumably to find a smoking gun to prosecute the Clinton campaign, the DNC and the data company for collusion and worse. Seems like a counter-attack to me.

wernercd 11y ago
As if the public needs a smoking gun when the Clinton is surrounded by scandals from A to Z. It amazes me that Sanders isn't going guns-a-blazing with all the Scandals and Corruption that emanates from the Clinton name brand. Why look for the needle in a haystack when you have a stack of needles sitting next to the haystack?
- samstave 11y ago
  Just look at how many vids exist, even from years ago, of Hillary caught in various lies: https://www.google.com/search?q=video+of+hillary+lying&rlz=1CDGOYI_enUS651US651&hl=en-US&prmd=vni&source=lnms&tbm=vid&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjxzumckvrJAhVV_mMKHdQSDFUQ_AUIBygB https://www.google.com/search?q=video+of+hillary+lying&rlz=1...
- d23 11y ago
  The problem is our politicians have a nasty habit of overplaying their hand on every. single. "scandal." It starts to sound like the boy who cried wolf. Every time a new one pops up, it's hard to tell whether it is of substance or just another game of political football. It makes sense that after two decades of attacks on their name, the public is a little more hesitant to be riled up.
- MaysonL 11y ago
  All the accusations of Scandals and Corruption that emanate from the Republican echo chamber. There, ftfy.
  - wernercd 11y ago
    That's it... keep your head stuck in the sand. That'll make all the "accusations" untrue. Those wasky wepublicans. They made 40 years of lies and scandals ALL up. Every. Single. One. I mean... being a Democrat is more important that the truth. Or more important than being an American... Seriously though... At least BS seems to have the credibility that 'Liar'y doesn't. There is a reason Hillary is losing in credibility and trust-ability. Blaming Republicans is like blaming Obama's falling numbers on racism: Proof that you can't stay focused on the facts and instead have to focus on the big bad boogey man. I couldn't in good conscience ever vote for a Democrat, but I'd vote BS before 'liar'y any day of the week.
themartorana 11y ago
Of course she was ready to move on. That would provide for maximum damage to the Sanders campaign and minimum investigation into hers. I trust her less that I trust Trump, and that's not at all.
mfisher87 11y ago
She was ready to move on when someone else got attacked, yes. Why wouldn't she? She only stands to benefit from ignoring the issue, and she stands to suffer for engaging.
wetmore 11y ago
>The characterization was that Sanders is "Saturnine" The characterization was of Obama, not Sanders. Or at least that's what the post says right now.