3 ms·
I don't really disagree, but that would make for a rather perverse unit, given that inverse temperatures are already on a logarithm scale relative to the probab
by gajomi 11y ago
I don't really disagree, but that would make for a rather perverse unit, given that inverse temperatures are already on a logarithm scale relative to the probabilities of microscopic states.
- labster 11y agoLogarithms are like violence—if it's not flat yet, you need to use more.