I see, by "in the paper itself" and "the original paper" you mean "Is Sound Gradual Typing Dead? [pdf] (neu.edu)" not the paper `sitkack` referenced. Same prob

I see, by "in the paper itself" and "the original paper" you mean "Is Sound Gradual Typing Dead? [pdf] (neu.edu)" not the paper `sitkack` referenced. Same problem in section 6.1 -- " “Reticulated programs perform far worse than their unchecked Python implementations” -- and nothing to support your claim that "Reticulated Python is still an order of magnitude faster than Ruby".