3 ms·
I'm referring to section 6.1 of the original paper which very much does exist (PDF page 11). Not that the Ruby vs Python detour hasn't been amusing, but my cor
by tacos 11y ago
I'm referring to section 6.1 of the original paper which very much does exist (PDF page 11).
Not that the Ruby vs Python detour hasn't been amusing, but my core argument can and should have been better stated as: debug builds are slower than release builds and people still use them. Therefore this technology is not dead.
- igouy 11y agoI see, by "in the paper itself" and "the original paper" you mean "Is Sound Gradual Typing Dead? [pdf] (neu.edu)" not the paper `sitkack` referenced. Same problem in section 6.1 -- " “Reticulated programs perform far worse than their unchecked Python implementations” -- and nothing to support your claim that "Reticulated Python is still an order of magnitude faster than Ruby".