3 ms·
> I also find being rich around 60 years pointless, since you've wasted too much of your life working for "the man" at that point. Lolwut? Sure it's better to
by JabavuAdams 11y ago
> I also find being rich around 60 years pointless, since you've wasted too much of your life working for "the man" at that point.
Lolwut? Sure it's better to be young and rich but don't discount the comfort of being old(er) and rich.
That said, your plan sounds pretty good. How does your plan change if you want to raise kids?
- wsc981 11y ago> That said, your plan sounds pretty good. How does your plan change if you want to raise kids? If I'd have kids (and wife) I'd need way more money of course. But I don't want kids of my own. This opinion of me hasn't changed in the last 10 years and I don't think it'll change in the future. I believe there are already plenty enough people on earth and more people wouldn't make the world necessarily a better place.
- JabavuAdams 11y ago> I believe there are already plenty enough people on earth and more people wouldn't make the world necessarily a better place. Not contradicting your decision, but I have to argue this point. There are not enough creative, educated, tolerant, empathetic people in the world. Every educated tolerant person with empathy is a little win for civilization. So, if you think you can make or train one, then there's an argument for having or mentoring kids.