>Just 40 years ago "global warming" was called "global cooling", and an ice-age apocalypse was predicted No serious scientist ever thought we were going into a

>Just 40 years ago "global warming" was called "global cooling", and an ice-age apocalypse was predicted No serious scientist ever thought we were going into an ice age 40 years ago. >The good old thinking that you know everything and can't be wrong almost guarantees that you will be wrong. Ad hominem arguments are not very helpful, but where exactly did I argue that I can’t be wrong? If you have an actual argument that shows I am wrong please post it. It has to be better than a warmed up precautionary principle.