5 ms·
This seems to be conflating two issues. One is that Facebook has changed their default profile privacy recently, which is a real issue that got a lot of press.
by seldo 17y ago
This seems to be conflating two issues. One is that Facebook has changed their default profile privacy recently, which is a real issue that got a lot of press.
The second is specifically their album privacy settings, which are not a million miles away in complexity from twitalbum's own and include the very useful "except for" feature.
It looks like the author is trying to hitch a ride on popular discomfort with default-publicity to advertise their service, even though it's not substantially different.
I'm not Facebook's biggest fan or anything, but this just looks like a naked grab for publicity.
- fabiandesimone 17y agoAbout the "except for" feature: Is our believe that is easier for a user to choose which users get to see something rather that to choose from say 500 friends which ones do not. More than publicity, we are trying to start a discussion. It helps us create a better service based on valid arguments.