3 ms·
Hi Daniel, indeed it does. Actually I think you are referring specifically to: "Let members invite others to the Album" There are two reasons for this: 1.
by fabiandesimone 17y ago
Hi Daniel, indeed it does.
Actually I think you are referring specifically to:
"Let members invite others to the Album"
There are two reasons for this:
1. We make it VERY easy to be private. If you wish to have control over each user that has access to your album, just un-check that and you are done.
2. We believe we are private by default because if you create an album and I'm not invited by you or one of your friends (that you previously invited) I can't see the album. That is different than being able to see your media for the simple fact that if I'm friends with one of your friends without being invited.
- scott_s 17y agoIf the more public option is the default, then you can not claim to be "private by default." Further, if someone else can invite others to see something of mine, then you are removing my control of privacy. My personal view is that if you put something on the internet, it's not private. My Facebook account and everything I put in it are public - I find it's easier for me to answer the question "Do I want the whole world to know this?" versus understanding the complicated network-visibility rules in Facebook. In other words, I don't fault Facebook or Twitpic for defaulting to public options. But don't claim that you default to private do when you clearly do not.
- ryanelkins 17y agoI agree, this isn't privacy by default. The default settings are public. By definition, this is public by default. That being said, I don't know if there is anything wrong with that. It's the changing of a user's settings midstream that's shady.