4 ms·
You just described what google has done in slightly more technical detail than the article. I don't know why. It is definitely not what was meant. Supporting
by aljones 11y ago
You just described what google has done in slightly more technical detail than the article. I don't know why. It is definitely not what was meant. Supporting encrypted communications is a prerequisite to publicly advocating for it, but it is not publicly advocating for it.