>No, you've misread the packaging. It appears I have actually. Thanks for pointing this out! That removes a lot of my issue with the article with that issue, b

>No, you've misread the packaging. It appears I have actually. Thanks for pointing this out! That removes a lot of my issue with the article with that issue, because it didn't exist to begin with. Just my own misreading. :) If I'm allowed to excuse why I overlooked that 4 - I'd blame my familiarity with the male packaging. I didn't even notice the 4 when looking for numbers because it didn't have words next to it! At this point I'd be more offended that they think the word "cartridge" is too difficult for women and use a picture of the blade instead, as if they're children.