3 ms·
> One screenshot hurts their entire argument, because I cannot take the rest of what they say at face value. Notice that the $18.49 package gives five razors wh
by danhak 11y ago
> One screenshot hurts their entire argument, because I cannot take the rest of what they say at face value. Notice that the $18.49 package gives five razors while the $14.99 package gives four razors. The $3.50~ markup is due to an additional razor being provided.
No, you've misread the packaging. Both packages contain 4 razor cartridges. The number 5 you highlighted on the women's product advertises 5 blades per cartridge (same as the men's product) but the package contains only 4 cartridges as you'll see if you look a little further to the right. You can see a higher resolution photo of the product and some more details here: https://shop.riteaid.com/schick-hydro-silk-razor-cartridges-4-cartridges-0368651 https://shop.riteaid.com/schick-hydro-silk-razor-cartridges-...
- Nadya 11y ago>No, you've misread the packaging. It appears I have actually. Thanks for pointing this out! That removes a lot of my issue with the article with that issue, because it didn't exist to begin with. Just my own misreading. :) If I'm allowed to excuse why I overlooked that 4 - I'd blame my familiarity with the male packaging. I didn't even notice the 4 when looking for numbers because it didn't have words next to it! At this point I'd be more offended that they think the word "cartridge" is too difficult for women and use a picture of the blade instead, as if they're children.