3 ms·
The opposite has happened. Steve Jobs introduced H.264 as providing significantly higher quality at the same or lower bitrate. He shows an still from an existin
by jonhohle 11y ago
The opposite has happened. Steve Jobs introduced H.264 as providing significantly higher quality at the same or lower bitrate. He shows an still from an existing MPEG-4 video and then a much higher resolution still from an H.264 encoded MPEG-4 video and claims that they require the same bitrate. He brings out Frank Casanova who goes on for 5 minutes or so about quality at lower bitrates. [0]
IIRC, Apple also sold AAC as requiring lower bandwidth for the same quality, but I don't recall when that was.
0 - https://youtu.be/dPCNUExWR6I?t=3271 https://youtu.be/dPCNUExWR6I?t=3271
- colanderman 11y agoIt is a bit disingenuous to compare video codec quality using stills. One can simply choose a key frame (= no temporal compression) to compare, and they'd likely be identical regardless of how well the codecs compress motion in non-key frames. (Not sure if the video clarifies this point since I cannot watch it right now.)