3 ms·

You're no really trying to make a case by linking to Mercola's site? What's up next? Chemtrails? Edit to add : Mr Mercola and his ilk is one of the most aggre

• mitchtbaum 11y ago
  I linked to three studies cited by more than 50 other studies, each. How about taking a look at them? If their information matches with Mercola's account and you support these studies approaches, the researchers, or both, then you can kindly take back your self-proven, inaccurate attack... Those who attack messengers, receive only messages they like, if any.
• DiabloD3 11y ago
  Mercola is a bit of flipping a coin, in my opinion. A lot of what he says is "well researched", but said to pander to the crowd you're thinking of. The articles that aren't fringe bullshit are actually pretty well done. Unfortunately, for every legitimate article on his site, there's a "microwaves destroy food" and "cell phones eat your soul" type of article. tl;dr: I'd use Mercola as a secondary link backing up more legitimate primary links, but I wouldn't base my entire argument on them.