3 ms·

I'm also a phan, but phabricator is more complex than GitLab and doesn't have (to my knowledge) a free, hosted version like gitlab.com. It also isn't quite as a

by cmrx64 11y ago

I'm also a phan, but phabricator is more complex than GitLab and doesn't have (to my knowledge) a free, hosted version like gitlab.com. It also isn't quite as appropriate for open source projects, in my (admittedly somewhat limited) experience with it. I really do love differential though, and its UI is very cohesive.

electrum 11y ago
Facebook uses it for some open source projects: https://reviews.facebook.net/ https://reviews.facebook.net/
- deleted 11y ago
  [deleted]
eeZi 11y ago
It's much better suited for open source projects than GitHub, not only due to the powerful issue tracker and other community features. An incomplete list of projects using it, some of them VERY large: - Blender (https://developer.blender.org/ https://developer.blender.org/) - LLVM (http://reviews.llvm.org/ http://reviews.llvm.org/) - Haskell (https://phabricator.haskell.org https://phabricator.haskell.org) - Wikimedia (after lots of discussion and a lengthy selection process, https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/ https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/) - FreeBSD (https://reviews.freebsd.org/ https://reviews.freebsd.org/) - Fedora (in some places, for example: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/ https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/) - Khan Academy (https://phabricator.khanacademy.org/ https://phabricator.khanacademy.org/) - Enlightenment (https://phab.enlightenment.org/ https://phab.enlightenment.org/) - KDE (https://phabricator.kde.org/ https://phabricator.kde.org/) - Freedesktop (https://phabricator.freedesktop.org https://phabricator.freedesktop.org) - lighttpd (https://review.lighttpd.net https://review.lighttpd.net) - Kolab (https://git.kolab.org/ https://git.kolab.org/) - ... Wikimedia hat lots of content about their choice and the migration process: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/FAQ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/FAQ Phabricator has been in use as a production tool for years and it shows. It is much more sophisticated in terms of workflow and real-world use than alternatives.
- viraptor 11y ago
  It's interesting to see which projects have experience with naming servers (anyone who didn't include "phab" in the name)
- mineo 11y ago
  Note that not all of those use Phabricator as a bug tracker (KDE, lighttpd, LLVM, Haskell, I imagine a lot of bugs for Wikimedia are reported through project chat pages on the wikis themselves).

by cmrx64 11y ago

electrum 11y ago

Facebook uses it for some open source projects: https://reviews.facebook.net/ https://reviews.facebook.net/

deleted 11y ago
[deleted]

eeZi 11y ago

It's much better suited for open source projects than GitHub, not only due to the powerful issue tracker and other community features. An incomplete list of projects using it, some of them VERY large: - Blender (https://developer.blender.org/ https://developer.blender.org/) - LLVM (http://reviews.llvm.org/ http://reviews.llvm.org/) - Haskell (https://phabricator.haskell.org https://phabricator.haskell.org) - Wikimedia (after lots of discussion and a lengthy selection process, https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/ https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/) - FreeBSD (https://reviews.freebsd.org/ https://reviews.freebsd.org/) - Fedora (in some places, for example: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/ https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/) - Khan Academy (https://phabricator.khanacademy.org/ https://phabricator.khanacademy.org/) - Enlightenment (https://phab.enlightenment.org/ https://phab.enlightenment.org/) - KDE (https://phabricator.kde.org/ https://phabricator.kde.org/) - Freedesktop (https://phabricator.freedesktop.org https://phabricator.freedesktop.org) - lighttpd (https://review.lighttpd.net https://review.lighttpd.net) - Kolab (https://git.kolab.org/ https://git.kolab.org/) - ... Wikimedia hat lots of content about their choice and the migration process: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/FAQ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/FAQ Phabricator has been in use as a production tool for years and it shows. It is much more sophisticated in terms of workflow and real-world use than alternatives.

viraptor 11y ago
It's interesting to see which projects have experience with naming servers (anyone who didn't include "phab" in the name)
mineo 11y ago
Note that not all of those use Phabricator as a bug tracker (KDE, lighttpd, LLVM, Haskell, I imagine a lot of bugs for Wikimedia are reported through project chat pages on the wikis themselves).