It was a natural post. Twitter disasters are the quickest source of outrage, and outrage is traffic. I didn't think about whether or not I might be ruining Sacc

It was a natural post. Twitter disasters are the quickest source of outrage, and outrage is traffic. I didn't think about whether or not I might be ruining Sacco's life. That's Gawker for you. They never care for the people they write about, they only care for the clicks. Just like when they outed the CFO of Condé Nast: http://www.salon.com/2015/07/17/gawker_drags_media_coverage_to_a_new_low_outing_an_executive_just_because_they_can/ http://www.salon.com/2015/07/17/gawker_drags_media_coverage_... And who could forget the time when they filed the sexual assault of a guy under "first world problem": https://archive.is/f0ZbV https://archive.is/f0ZbV (archive link because no traffic for Gawker).