4 ms·
It does definitely... though they really drop the ball after the main event is over at least from a perspective of the news. the news would beat this to death a
by weaksauce 11y ago
It does definitely... though they really drop the ball after the main event is over at least from a perspective of the news. the news would beat this to death and then after 3 days stop covering it. This was maybe 5 min after the mission was a success that they cut the feed. milk it for all it's worth and show some of the other successes and failures from past missions. It definitely feels like the mission pr was handled by engineers. (not trying to be a jerk as I am an engineer)
Really such a groundbreaking thing like this should be glorified in the media and put on loop for a while. simply amazing.
- shpx 11y ago> show some of the other successes and failures from past missions And confuse people that happen to be tuning in at the wrong time? No thanks. This is a live stream not a news broadcast.
- weaksauce 11y agoyou can always have a big flashing banner that says "previously recorded" or "prior missions" or something like that.
- imdsm 11y agoI can get the news from other places, I like that the live feed is just the live feed. Once it's done, it's done. Let's not fill it with shit shall we?
- rblatz 11y agoI agree, I don't need the perspective of an author over top of the launch audio feed. I liked the rougher but more authentic streams they did in the past.